• BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, Scandinavian countries just have a healthy government. Countries like China have awful, awful climate impacts, much worse off than most other countries. Though, them and France at least have started a nuclear build-out, which is needed to 100% de-carbonize the grid.

    • ramenbellic@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      China manages to be the manufacturing hub of the world AND have a lower carbon footprint per capita than the United States. We don’t have time to keep pointing fingers and making excuses, we need to be making changes.

    • kescusay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I… don’t think we disagree? China has a corrupt communist government. I was specifically referring to socialist governments, and the ones that are frequently (mis)labelled as socialist are doing a lot better on oil consumption than either China or the United States.

      • Robaque@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you’re splitting hairs about communism, socialism, and “mislabelling” (even though socialism is a generic term that encompasses communism…?), why are you describing China’s government as communist? Communism is (ideally, at least) stateless, and like all socialist idologies it is fundamentally anti-capitalist.

        You’re right that the Nordic model isn’t socialist, though. It’s a blend of social democracy and corporatism.