Edited to add - To be clear for anyone, it’s Oligarchs/Billionaires paired with rampant, unfettered corporate greed. (at least in my view)

Someone reminded me that I was using dogwhistle parlance in my use of they which may have suggested otherwise.

Here are some visual aids to accompany my clarification:

  • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Man, fuck all that. “Socialists” just let authoritarians into power who then never let go. Your revolution will just leave a warlord in a Che shirt.

    Democratic governments with strong social safety nets and robust middle classes are consistently capitalistic. Do you have an example otherwise?

    edit: 20 minutes, four downvotes, and zero examples otherwise.

    edit: maybe I’ve blocked 10 authoritarian tankies that I cannot read their replies. Hmm.

    • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Like we aren’t already living in an authoritarian hell hole where the government doesnt represent the will of the people.

      Democratic governments have a strong safety net? Really? Better tell then nearly a million homeless in the richest country in the world that they have better social nets then china, cuba, USSR which all guaranteed a home for everyone to live in. Hell there is still a guarantee in the Russian constitution which is better then non-acknowledgement of the US.

      Did you notice how the global south is still poor and has major issues and just about every fucking country is a Democratic government?

      Calling Che Guvera a dictator is hilarious since he died fighting for Revolution in Bolivia after he helped free Cuba from the US imperialist grip. Definitely the actions of a power hungry dictator that already won power in an island nation.

      You still haven’t done any fucking reading. Could you stop with the fucking NATO, imperialist propaganda please. If you aren’t then at least get more informed. Your embarssing to all the other boot lickers.

      Edit:

      Cuba has a strong protections for its people and a growing economy due to trade with the BRICS alliance.

      China has uplifted millions out of poverty before capitalism was introduced in the 1990s

      Rojava is doing well for itself considering its location in northern Syria.

      • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Wow. Where to start?

        Democratic governments have a strong safety net?

        Like FDR.

        Did you notice how the global south is still poor and has major issues and just about every fucking country is a Democratic government?

        <citation needed>

        Calling Che Guvera a dictator is hilarious

        No, I call Che Guevara a silly commie.

        Edit:

        lol

        • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Gee I wonder what happens to the line “Capitalism lifted millions out poverty” when you take out China. 🤦

          Notice how we don’t have FDR style protections anymore and haven’t since the 1970s? Doesn’t count if it doesnt exist anymore. The only places those safety nets exist is in the Scandinavian countries and those protections are the result of the Second International which was a Communist organization.

          Che Guevara is a commie so I guess I don’t actually have a problem with that. But a commie warlord would actually idolize Mao. Learn your communist figures.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Economist_Democracy_Index?wprov=sfla1

          71 countries in the global south are considered democratic by the West. Thats a full 45% of them including places like Argentina, Brazil, Chile. Notice how all of these countries have issues that are already solved in the US? Notice how having a Democratic government in place didn’t create safety nets. Notice how these place dont have a safety net.

          Sorry what was that about socialist countries solving or having similar problems that “Democratic governments” still haven’t solved themselves?

          • Sal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            China is capitalism with a red flag, and so is Cuba, and so was the USSR. All failed projects that just returned back to capitalism. The fact you’re trying to argue this shit while coming from lemmy.ml is hilarious. We all know your actual alignment.

            China didn’t lift anyone out of poverty. Just like capitalists, they just lowered the poverty threshold. They’re currently oppressing their workers with massive work hours, no choice to join any union that isn’t the government’s, and they still have billionaires.

            China is not and will never be socialist. You’re a capitalist with a hammer and sickle.

            • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Theoretically China is what they call “communism with Chinese characteristics”. Many Marxist still regard China as socialist, generally it’s only libtards that have this opinion. For instance the real estate bubble in China would have been catastrophic for any Western democratic government. In China they just nationalized the company is that we’re failing and forgave all their debt. Now they don’t have to worry about those companies again since they were nationalized. Point to an example of a capitalist country that nationalized industry like this.

              Cuba is definitely a socialist state and has not returned to capitalism. If they had returned to capitalism the us would have lifted sanctions because the Cuban bourgeoisie would be able to return and try to reclaim “their lost wealth”. They consistently hold referendums for the public to vote on how to organize the National Industry. In fact they’re probably the closest thing to a successful socialist project in the western world. Down to and including having democratically elected leaders that can be recalled.

              Last I checked that’s not something that happens in the western world. Few countries have nationalized resources and practically none of them allow people to vote on how those nationalized resources are used.

          • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            13 hours ago

            those protections are the result of the Second International which was a Communist organization.

            BACK IN YOUR CAGE, TANKIE!

            blocked, in case you can’t tell.

            • dastanktal@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              Hey that’s the first smart thing you said all week.

              It’d be better if you just stop responding to my comments but hey you’re the one that wants to pick a fight so I’m more than happy to play your stupid game.

              Also be better if you just block me in the first place. Don’t let the door hit your ass on the way out.👋