StuartLemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
runiq@feddit.org to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish ·
edit-2
14 hours ago

Trump Doesn't Want to Release Epstein Files Because People's Lives Will Be 'Destroyed,' Ex-Fox Host Says

www.latintimes.com

external-link
message-square
49
fedilink
314
external-link

Trump Doesn't Want to Release Epstein Files Because People's Lives Will Be 'Destroyed,' Ex-Fox Host Says

www.latintimes.com

runiq@feddit.org to politics @lemmy.worldEnglish ·
edit-2
14 hours ago
message-square
49
fedilink
A former Fox News host stated that President Donald Trump is avoiding releasing the Epstein files as it would impact those named within the files and ruin their lives.

https://archive.ph/e1QQx

alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Bizzle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    52 minutes ago

    If you rape kids your life should be destroyed though

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    34 minutes ago

    First and foremost his.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’m just happy that they say “ex-Fox Host” because it implies that people don’t know who Bill O’Relliy is.

  • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Isn’t that the point? To destroy the lives of pedophiles?

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Trump Doesn’t Want to Release Epstein Files Because (rich) People’s Lives Will Be ‘Destroyed,’ inconvenienced with having to spend money on lawyers when a few of their wives divorce them Ex-Fox Host Says

    Real “Brock Turner-ism” happening here. Be sad that some rich people might get in trouble.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 hours ago

    LOL, he must be talking about himself, since he never gives a rat’s ass if someone else’s life is destroyed - see for example, the outcomes of DOGE, ICE…

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Trump could rape a underage girl on camera and nobody would care.

      • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        He almost certainly has.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Good guy Trump looking out for the poor, helpless <checks notes> rapists.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Unlike their victims who’s lives do nothing but thrive

    /s

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Yes… the child rapists’ lives would be destroyed… that is the general idea… and you are opposed to that? Are you soft on crime? The crime in this case being child rape? Or are you just, specifically, pro-child rape?

  • SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Who’s lives, donnie? That’s important to clear out.

  • bender223@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It’s a sacrifice I’m will to make 😔

  • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The only life he cares about: his.

  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    So the kids that where raped lives are fine to ruin. But some rich asshole nope gave to protect them. Kill them all.

  • Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 hours ago

    As they absofuckinglutely should.

  • WanderWisley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Yes trump is on the list, but idk if it is even released and his name and photo/vids are there I doubt his life would be destroyed. More then likely this supporters would just say it’s taken out of context and still vote for him when he inevitably runs for a 3rd term.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 2.98K users / day
  • 6.54K users / week
  • 12.2K users / month
  • 26.9K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 24.7K subscribers
  • 5.99K Posts
  • 122K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org