edit: seems like some people interpret “full of” as a mathematical majority which, while it may or might not be true instance to instance, isn’t my intent in posting

feel free to swap in “has a lot of” if that’s more familiar language to you :)

  • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    me: lists evidence of voter suppression in 1920, 1965, and today

    you: THAT WAS OVER 60 YEARS AGO

    me: i don’t think you saw the part where i said “today”

    you: name calling

    i love this website so much