• catty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    In this Act “terrorism” means the use or threat of action where—

    the action falls within subsection (2), the use or threat is designed to influence the government [or an international governmental organisation][1] or to intimidate the public or a section of the public

    Wow, so the very act of peaceful protest is now defined as ‘terrorism’ because the below can be very loosely interpreted in whatever way necessary:

    creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public

    • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public

      I don’t know: it’s possible. If legal definitions & case law (which I don’t know enough about) don’t settle their meaning, then they could mean anything. A lawyer could clarify.