• ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I hate to be nitpicky about a meme but I love to be nitpicky. This claims is based on bullshit statistics that the author made up or bent to his will. The Ottoman empire alone shows this to be incorrect but Rome too stands out. Besides, what would an arbitrary amount of time have to do with the collapse of complex economic systems. Its bullshit idealism and I hate seeing it.

    I am begging the US to collapse though

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Also worth pointing out that, while America may be 249 years old, no one would consider it an empire for the majority of that time. Its debatable, but I would argue we didn’t really reach an empirical level of power until the late 40s, when we started taking over what was left of the British Empire’s influence over the middle-eas5.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The US has always been a settler-colony, but it became more Imperialist after World War I with the inter-ally debts. It became world hegemon after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, however.

    • LwL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Average. It’s just an average. I haven’t verified whether the number is accurate (and often it’s probably debatable what qualifies as an empire and at what point it fell) but some empires lasting way longer does nothing to disprove 250 years being the average lifespan.

      The second part of what you said is still entirely correct of course, that number has no real predictive capabilities for the collapse of the USA.

      • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It isn’t though, I have seen the original source of this claim and its bs. The author just picks and chooses when empires begin and end so that it fits their claim. I would concede the point if it were ever actually an average.

        • LwL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I mean yea that doesn’t surprise me in the slightest honestly, even outside of the number itself being pretty meaningless in the first place it’s very fuzzy what the actual dates are.