• solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Multiple pastors tell me, essentially, the same story about quoting the Sermon on the Mount, parenthetically, in their preaching—‘turn the other cheek’—[and] to have someone come up after to say, ‘Where did you get those liberal talking points?’" Moore said.

    “When the pastor would say, ‘I’m literally quoting Jesus Christ’ … The response would be, 'Yes, but that doesn’t work anymore. That’s weak,” he added.

    https://www.newsweek.com/evangelicals-rejecting-jesus-teachings-liberal-talking-points-pastor-1818706

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        what has millennia of the “no true christian!!!” arguing accomplished?

        if someone calls themself a “christian” then that’s what they are, and they’re using the same stone age book of tall tales to argue why they’re the only true christians

        fuck religion altogether, i say

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          what has millennia of the “no true christian!!!” arguing accomplished?

          I mean, not much, but rejecting the teachings of Jesus is still literally heresy. If we are to have a useful definition of the word “Christian,” it kinda has to include believing in the word of Christ.

          • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            lol according to whom? “true” chrsitians? the ones who are the self-proclaimed “authority” on what that means, and what anything jesus supposedly said means?

            nope. “christian” is literally anyone who calls themself christian

        • Wugmeister@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          No, seriously, there’s been a shift in the way the people use the word evangelical. I’ll have to dig it up, but I saw a street interview recently where a reporter person is interrogating a man identifying as an evangelical who when prodded on the teachings of Jesus responded with “I don’t believe in all that Jesus stuff, I’m an atheist”. Apparently a lot of people are identifying as evangelicals as a political identity, not as a religious identity. Evangelicals literally are no longer Christians anymore.

      • blaue_Fledermaus@mstdn.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        There’s the problem that “Evangelical” is too broad a category, there are churches that historically are considered Evangelical, but don’t share in that anti-christian insanity.