Schools and lawmakers are grappling with how to address a new form of peer-on-peer image-based sexual abuse that disproportionately targets girls.

  • seralth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    There is a difference between ruining the life of a 13 year old boy for the rest of his life with no recourse and no expectations.

    Vs scaring the shit out of them and making them work their ass off doing an ass load of community service for a summer.

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      ruining the life of a 13 year old boy for the rest of his life with no recourse

      And what about the life of the girl this boy would have ruined?

      This is not “boys will be boys” shit. Girls have killed themselves over this kind of thing (I have personal experience with suicidal teenage girls, both as a past friend and as a father).

      I don’t think it’s unreasonable to expect an equivalent punishment that has the potential to ruin his life.

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Fake pictures do not ruin your life… sorry…

        Our puritanical / 100% sex culture is the problem, not fake pictures…

      • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It is not abnormal to see different punishment for people under the age of 18. Good education about sex and what sexual assault does with their victims (same with guns, drugs including alcohol etc).

        You can still course correct the behaviour of a 13 year old. There is also a difference between generating the porn and abusing it by sharing it etc.

        The girls should be helped and the boys should be punished, but mainly their behaviour needs to be correcte

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Parents are responsible for their kids. The punishment, with the full force of the law (and maybe something extra for good measure), should fall upon the parents, since they should have made sure their kids knew how despicable and illegal doing this is.

        Yeah, I agree, we shouldn’t ruin the boys life, we should ruins his whole family to many times the extent something like this ruins a teen girl’s life.

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yeah, I agree, we shouldn’t ruin the boys life, we should ruins his whole family to many times the extent something like this ruins a teen girl’s life.

          You’re a fucking asshole. This isn’t like prosecuting parents who let a school shooter have access to guns. The interenet is everywhere. Parents are responsible for bringing up their children to be socially responsible. A thirteen year old kid is anything but responsible (I mean their mentality / maturity, I’m not giving them a pass).

          Go hang out with conservatives who want more policing. Over here, we’ll talk about social programs you fucking prick.