• VitoRobles@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I like it.

    It’s the “Use your kid’s slang to make them realize it’s garbage” reverse card.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Bizarre AI-generated images are currently flooding Facebook, as engagement hacks and bots run rampant on the social media platform, spawning a meme-worthy image that has been dubbed “Shrimp Jesus.”

    • Spezi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s actually working, many people around me that were enthusiastic about AI are now pissed off by it thanks to all that shit.

  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I feel like it usually minionizes anything it touches anyways, so that’s a surprisingly good fit for it.

  • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Too bad the supreme court put the dagger in artists backs for AI already. It would have been great if a company would license an artists source material to make a set of variations for a limited venue. Like a company licensing a voice actor’s samples, then they get to use AI to make those characters say whatever they want, in that one movie, or that one game, based on the license.

    As it is now, we’re going to end up with Spruce Lee fighting Hackie Chan movies, and none of the actors or their estates will get to say shit about it.

    • XM34@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 minutes ago

      You don’t really know how AI works, do you? A single voice actor couldn’t produce enough lines to fully train an AI model even if they spent every second of their life in the recording booth.

      So tell me then, which of the billions of input recordings do you pay licensing fees for and how much? I mean sure, we could make a law that forces AI companies to pay for every single piece of training data. Which would probably kill AI training for the entire region where this law applies, severely crippling our already weakened economy. But I guess, at least we’re keeping the moral high ground while doing so.

      But seriously, the EU is cooking up a pretty amazing Ai law right now. Thought out by people far brighter than you and me and it seems to be pretty amazing at balancing economic interests with ethical obligation. My hopes are high for that one!

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        34 minutes ago

        In Spain we trained an AI using recorded congress sessions. Within the national, regional and city halls they had a lot of material.

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        what confuses me a lot about america is how a lot of people will defend the AI’s “right” to steal training data to learn (education)

        when there’s millions of students out there going into life long debt to go to collage, and none of the same americans are fighting for their right to learn for free

        • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I am only critical that those models are in the hand of corporations who try to profit from it. Copyrights are mainly a tool to be wielded by the powerful: see Sony trying to disconnect ISP accounts en masse or media giants suing people into oblivion, Nintendo fucking over their fanbase again and again and so on.

          The datasets should belong to an UN organisation like UNESCO, corporations/NGOs/people should be able to licence them to build their models (ev. with “community models” provided free for personal use), and the licence fees should be used to subsidize culture. This plus an UBI would make sure that artists don’t have to starve, corporations can use them to try to make a profit, and everyone else can use them to create for their own or their communities use. Artists that don’t want to go into the datasets have that right too, but also won’t have access to that financial pool (this shouldn’t be the only pool).

          Fuck copyrights.

        • XM34@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          1st, I’m not Murrican, I’m German. 2nd the right to free education is one of the most important human right and the entire world is paying the price right now for neglecting this right over the past decades 3rd AI is here to stay. It’s far to impactfull as a technology. Whether we like it or not. So we either create an Environment where it can thrive within certain rules or we watch as others use it to completely overtake us.

          • shneancy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            ok? and i’m polish, i was talking about americans.

            AI is not just ethically dubious, it’d also outright harmful for the already strained environment we live in. If AI stays - it won’t be here for long, mostly because there won’t be anoyone to ask it to generate giant hentai tits anymore

          • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            AI is here to stay. It’s far to impactfull as a technology

            Gonna need some proof for that. So far it doesn’t actually do anything useful.

            • Honytawk@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Open your eyes and step off that hate bandwagon.

              Machine Learning has revolutionized protein folding and plenty of other sciences. LLMs have increased programmer productivity (even if it isn’t perfect yet). Image/video/song generating was something we thought to be impossible a couple of years ago.

              If the only news you get about AI comes from the “Fuck AI” community, you won’t ever get accurate info.

              Yes companies put AI in a bunch of shitty things that don’t need it. But to claim AI doesn’t do anything useful is just plain wrong.

              • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                29 minutes ago

                Machine Learning has revolutionized protein folding and plenty of other sciences.

                I actually work in the field of protein crystallography. Contrary to newspaper reporting by people who don’t understand the field and just repeat what the person who developed the tool says about it, it has made just a small improvement to analysing experimental data which we could have easily made using traditional algorithmic approaches with a similar amount of resources spent. And this is one of its biggest legitimate impacts - it absolutely hasn’t “revolutionised plenty of other sciences”, or you’d be able to list more things than just alphafold.

                It doesn’t improve programmer productivity, it increases the lines of code created, which is a really bad metric for productivity. There is good evidence that its use is already leading to increased code churn, that means someone is having to go back and revisit the additional new errors introduced by AI tools, which is obviously less productive.

    • DearOldGrandma@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      The youngest boomers are 64 still. We may be done working with them in 10 years or so but they’re stubborn. The ones still working then are the ones who never could win financially or are the ones who took advantage of everyone and never learned to stop.

      • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        By then Gen X will have replaced them, and going on about reminiscing about how mix CDs burned from MP3s downloaded from AOL sounded better than the vinyl and TikToks the kids are listening to will be the “we drank from the hose was our curfew” of the time

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Meh, unlikely. Gen X doesn’t have the sheer numbers to drive and sustain culture. The Boomers number something like 74,000,000 and Millennials are around 83,500,000. Meanwhile Gen X only has about 49,000,000 so we’re sandwiched between two Generations that are nearly double our size.