![](https://media.kbin.social/media/8c/1d/8c1d1881ca79cf8862f9f201db55d1badb1aad29c9032880a9403b914d634367.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
Yeah I’m pretty sure I didn’t say that but okay.
Hi I’m Lala! Hobby artist/law grad
Yeah I’m pretty sure I didn’t say that but okay.
The point is you shouldn’t have to depend on the whims of random people being willing to help you, when you are paying money for the airline already to do this job for you. Part of the airline’s literal job is to make sure you’re safe while you’re traveling.
This sounds an awful lot like victim blaming, and you’re advocating for what here? For random passengers to step in and beat this guy? If the airline attendants couldn’t control him, why should passengers need to step in? These women should rely on the random willingness of strangers to protect them? Also from a legal standpoint, other passengers do not owe a duty of care to other passengers. Only the airline has a legal duty to protect their passengers. So these people should absolutely should sue the shit ouf of this airline, because they negligently allowed an unruly passenger to continue harrassing other passengers for an entire flight when they were the only ones with a legal obligation to act.
Ooooor this person is just terrible at cutting bangs.
I get that this is probably a fake scenario for a joke but it’s not even particularly funny? What’s the punchline anyway, “haha I fucked up my kids hair and now it looks like shit lol lol”? Peak boomer humor.
Yeah this kind of shit here is why I do not regret leaving. My oldest reddit account is from back when Bush was still president and Idgaf anymore, it’s dead to me now. I’m looking forward to seeing kbin flourish instead.
Again, that’s not what I said. The context was “from a legal standpoint”, which is still accurate regardless of how you feel about it.