disregarding the fact that the model learns and extrapolates from the training data, not copying,
have fun figuring out which model made the image in the first place!
disregarding the fact that the model learns and extrapolates from the training data, not copying,
have fun figuring out which model made the image in the first place!
you’re gonna have a bad time restricting software
I wish that would stop Nintendo.
yeah- mistral and llama are the ones you want to looks at- grok is too big to run even on enterprise cards (and sucks worse than a model my pi can run)
I mean 90% of twitter is just rage, bait or misinformation lmfao
This person clearly doesn’t understand what they are talking about, it’s just a clown show at this point.
“to pirate nintendo games!!”
They were forced to settle because they pirated TOTK ahead of its actual release to allow yuzu to support it, then sold that version that supported it on patreon -> “Made money off it” in nintendo’s eyes. I think it’s fucking stupid that they’re gone, but I’m not surprised, Nintendo happily goes after anything.
Nintendo would target the easiest target, which would still be yuzu
Eh surprisingly they often break less on arch in my experience
Undertale. It was the best game I’ve ever played and I can never play it again. This game lives rent free in my head, in my fanworks, in the music I listen to and make. It’s a game that combines technology and art.
what is it?
what happens after.
huh, sometimes wikidot decides to break for a while, does it work now?
oh god that scp keeps me up at night
ok, fair; but do consider the context that the models are open weight. You can download them and use them for free.
There is a slight catch though which I’m very annoyed at: it’s not actually Apache. It’s this weird license where you can use the model commercially up until you have 700M Monthly users, which then you have to request a custom license from meta. ok, I kinda understand them not wanting companies like bytedance or google using their models just like that, but Mistral has their models on Apache-2.0 open weight so the context should definitely be reconsidered, especially for llama3.
It’s kind of a thing right now- publishers don’t want models trained on their books, „because it breaks copyright“ even though the model doesn’t actually remember copyrighted passages from the book. Many arguments hinge on the publishers being mad that you can prompt the model to repeat a copyrighted passage, which it can do. IMO this is a bullshit reason
anyway, will be an interesting two years as (hopefully) copyright will get turned inside out :)
ohno my copyright!!! How will the publisher megacorps now make a record quarter??? Think of the shareholders!
sure. Eeevery single message worth 1€. don’t see any issues here…
actual example please not like your other friend Luddite on the other comment