• 0 Posts
  • 31 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 7th, 2024

help-circle


  • Show my work ? You know it’s been done many times already? My point was, that anyone can verify it.

    Anyway, there are so many issues, untruths, misunderstandings and downright denial here there is nothing to really reply about. I’m not saying you are deliberately acting in bad faith, but shows how much bs is circulating around and how invested people are to not follow common sense. Or understand some basic truths, just science, math and tech truths.


  • When the exit polls are off, 300 years of exit polls suggest the ballots are off. When many states flunk basic stats when doing tests with precinct size and candidate ratios, generations of using these suggest the ballot counts are off.

    So what is happening here is that somehow the ballot counts are off for several important states. And most USA politically active people look at this, what I said, and think I just spoke Greek.

    There has long been a disconnect between the politically chattering social classes and the nerds who have been saying the tech here is too easily manipulated. I have yet, in the last decade, to see a political commentator who knows what they are talking about when discussing this. People like me have been frozen out of the discussion in both major parties since before 2016. It’s why I stopped being active in the Texas Democratic Party when I could not influence them a few years ago.

    I’m not wrong in any of my points; and it sounds like you are generalizing a very complex picture and throwing out a few terms for emphasis.

    There is much much more to all that, I promise you. If you or the reader is curious to learn more, but don’t need a tech heavy approach. Learn more about the history of exit polling or learn how the United Nations tests for ballot stuffing. Then apply it to a selection of states of your choice. You will find about a 2:3 ratio of questionable results.

    Then learn how other democracies count their ballots and check out the sane tests performed there. The uk has an easy to understand system if need to compare.

    Ballot stuffing is nothing new in USA politics; all political parties have indulged in it since the founding of this county, many people usually turn a blind eye. But sometimes more criticism did occur. What is different now in the last few decades is how it’s done, and how it’s dismissed and overlooked .

    This discussion is happening because USA politics is weird. I’m totally freaked out I still, after many years, have to take a kindergarten explanation to many, not just here.

    Look, bottom line is if you have to trust the vote counters then there is cheating. Period


  • I study history a lot, also I’m older so I have the perspective of two or three generations now.

    Things have normally been not the idealized concept of Disney princess goodness in government. Evil shits normally have been doing stuff for as long as civilization has existed. So all this is not new.

    What is new, and makes this newsworthy, is the masks have fallen off. Those masks and idealized fantasy much of the population indulges in took decades, generations to build up. In many ways this is a very rude culture shock.

    The other reason this is important now is the climate is rapidly collapsing while the trade systems have reached unprecedented complexity. So a group of particularly thuggish people rising to power in several nations at once, as they tend to do with regularity. May have epic and disastrous consequences! It’s a really bad time for this to happen







  • In my campaign I used to have a cursed scroll of reading. Which provided such provoking and interesting content based on one’s feelings and desires, it trapped the person into reading it for a very very long time unless saving throw.

    I can imagine how much more effective it would be if one could reply to that reading, and enter another level of entrapment.

    And here we have cursed scrolls in real life. Me 30 years ago would never have guessed .

    Unrelated, but this is where I stop doomscrolling for the day. So long until tomorrow, unless I make my daily saving roll


  • It’s more hidden but more of a problem now, actually.

    But it’s such a complicated multi faceted issue with things that vary state by state it’s hard to do coverage without literally writing pages and pages. And very few people know all the stuff going on.

    I will list some of my issues being generic as possible: (edited formatting below)

    • it’s possible to write voting systems which allow one or two people who run the company to skew the results without the rest of the company having a clue. ( this I know by my 40 years of writing software)
    • election voting systems are very complex and can be messed with at over a dozen (literally) different ways, other than #1
    • the code and systems are normally trade secrets
    • the admins are unknown, who has admin keys is a private list. The security here is unknown
    • many states have exit polls done afterwards which are significantly different from the results
    • many states flunk or withhold data for basic tests for ballot stuffing
    • many places give printouts and receipts but no recounts use these, if recounts done at all
    • the general rule of thumb is if it’s too complex to understand how the voting works then it’s not fair voting
    • any electronic voting requires faith and trust to use. This is not how democracy works


  • This, what you said, is so important. In my years doing my own business, I have had literally hundreds of scammers, some smarter than me. Its best to just not even try to talk to people trying to contact you first in these platforms.

    And many many scammers will post jobs, and one cannot tell by seeing if this is a new account. Some of my multi year assignments have been initiated by sketchy new accounts. At the same time existing accounts of clients usually have their own preferred coders. If you get to talk to an existing account with a history, check out the reviews and be wary. There may be a reason they are seeking out new blood.

    I think its ok to go off site to talk to the new job candidates. Often, cannot have decent conversations in platform. And an in depth talk is free for all, and will often give clues in the first few minutes of talk.


  • (edit formatted)

    Things I learned the hard way:

    • Never agree on anything until can see the existing code and talk about everything.
    • Milestone payments only. Stay away from any lump sum payments or percentage cuts.
    • Full payments in escrow first.
    • Never reply to people you don’t know who seek you out, only seek out jobs.
    • In first contacts ask questions first, don’t talk about qualifications. If questions good then customer knows you know the tech well.
    • Learn to walk away if instincts kick in

  • People who support the server have greater voting rights; no revenue steam. But I think it would be cool to sell pirate plushies!

    Unrelated: If you code it’s not hard to insert ads in between the comments on your own lemmy instance. It would be a cool experience but probably would create significant vitriol and site wide bannings by most, if not all, major instances for trying.

    The problem for most monitization is psychological only ; many ideas would be an unwinnable uphill battle. Yes, can put ads in but also be a leper with zero traffic. You could probably put in perks if have good coding skills or can hire good skills; but if public relations done wrong then you are “poison to the community”.

    You could try to do awards ( Reddit gold) but may get laughed off the platform. It’s a tough crowd


  • Freelancer platforms that have paying stuff do exist, but it requires effort to learn how to use them; and during the long learning curve, one is usually grossly underpaid and sometimes scammed and or cheated.

    If in financial emergency it’s often better to not try this and try menial work outside industry. But one can find it as a decent resource stream after some trial and error which can take a year or more to learn