Colorado is great, just don’t move anywhere near Colorado Springs unless you wanna help turn it purple. The city is a Republican enclave wrapped around the Air Force Academy.
Colorado is great, just don’t move anywhere near Colorado Springs unless you wanna help turn it purple. The city is a Republican enclave wrapped around the Air Force Academy.
I have to go back over and stitch in the edges on all my iron-on patches, might have to look into that if they’ll do a better job.
What they ought to do is expunge the convictions and offer some form of recompense for the unjust treatment, but reparations aren’t something our government wants to talk about.
How old is Biden?
IIRC, you can run the Xiaomi unlocking software in wine: https://www.hardreset.info/devices/redmi/redmi-9c/faq/faq/xiaomi-bootloader-unlock-miui10/
Biden should stay home and send blåhaj to the debates in his place.
You mistyped “Gallons per mile”
It really isn’t a different debate when you’re talking about putting them on the blockchain, and all that other engineering has already been done by other distributed social networks.
Trust, consensus, and access control are session-layer issues that don’t need to be solved by a transport-layer protocol. Social networks deserve to be able to forget things.
We already have that, it’s called a Distributed Hash Table, no blockchain required.
knockoffs like Brave
No worries, I’m merely confident that the tradeoffs necessary to employ a blockchain aren’t worth the supposed benefits thereof.
I plan to, which pisses off Doctor Evil’s Democrats.
What if we don’t want global usernames? What if we’re entirely satisfied with global user IDs in a DHT?
Seems inefficient, couldn’t the same thing be accomplished using local DBs rather than the world’s most inefficient ledger?
Well, for starters, I’m not contradicting their point, I’m confirming it. The use of “cis” or “trans” in terms of gender and the knowledge of chromosomes are recent social constructions. The confusion seems to be in what is actually meant by “social construction”.
For example, you keep saying “biological differences” without prepending the word “stereotypical” in such a way that leads me to believe that you still think of sex as a pair of essential categories.
Gender is a social construct, yes, but Sex is a set of simplified generalizations about multiple highly complex and frequently interrelated phenomena that cannot be reduced to anatomy or chromosomes alone.
Ignoring the fact that these generalizations about sex are mere stereotypes to which many people do not conform is much more irresponsible than insufficiently explaining the social construction of gender.
Are you seriously incredulous at such a comparison?
Gender existed long before chromosomes were discovered.
Prolactin and oxytocin, mostly.