Hey, he’s like, just this guy, you know?

  • 45 Posts
  • 1.08K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle







  • The Supreme Court was thrown into chaos because republicans refused to appoint any justices under Obama

    Now, now, Obama DID get Sotomayor and Kagan. McConnell only blocked Merrick Garland.

    That being said, in my lifetime, Democratic Presidents have only put FIVE members on the court, Republicans got 15. Carter is the one who drew a blank.

    Nixon/Ford got as many in their two terms as all the Democrats since then COMBINED.

    https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/members_text.aspx

    Ginsburg, Ruth Bader - Clinton
    Breyer, Stephen G. - Clinton
    Sotomayor, Sonia - Obama
    Kagan, Elena - Obama
    Jackson, Ketanji Brown - Biden

    Burger, Warren Earl - Nixon
    Blackmun, Harry A. - Nixon
    Powell, Lewis F., Jr. - Nixon
    Rehnquist, William H. - Nixon
    Stevens, John Paul - Ford
    O’Connor, Sandra Day - Reagan
    Scalia, Antonin - Reagan
    Kennedy, Anthony M. - Reagan
    Souter, David H. - Bush, G. H. W.
    Thomas, Clarence - Bush, G. H. W.
    Roberts, John G., Jr. - Bush, G. W.
    Alito, Samuel A., Jr. - Bush, G. W.
    Gorsuch, Neil M. - Trump
    Kavanaugh, Brett M. - Trump
    Barrett, Amy Coney - Trump










  • It’s pretty clear you have no concept of how our system of government works.

    The Supreme Court is the top tier of the Judicial Branch, the 3rd “Separate but Equal” part of our government.

    You can’t just decide “Well, I don’t like you, I don’t have to do what you say.” Doing so cracks the very foundation of what our government is built on.

    Same if someone decided to ignore the President (Executive Branch) or a ruling coming from the House and Senate (Legislative Branch).

    The only difference is the President has the ability to sign or veto laws passed by Congress, and Congress can over-ride a veto.

    There is no similar constraint on Supreme Court rulings. They are the arbiter of what is or is not Constitutional. That’s their job. If you disagree with that, your options are 1) pass a new amendment or 2) a Constitutional convention.

    Whether I like or dislike their definition of the 2nd amendment is irrelevant. It’s THEIR definition. It’s settled law. My liking it or disliking it doesn’t change that.

    Want to change it? Make sure we have Democratic Presidents exclusively for, oh, the next 20 to 25 years or so. Hope we don’t have another block like they did with Merrick Garland.

    Thomas (75) and Alito (73) are the next likely two to age out. If that happens under a Democratic President, it could shift the balance from 6-3 to 4-5. Given ages of court deaths and retirees that’s probably 10-15 years from now.

    The next three though are Sotomayor (69), Roberts (68) and Kagan (63). Say what you want about Roberts, but he has served as a key swing vote, siding with the “liberal” judges on multiple occasions. Losing any or all of them under a Republican President would lock in a conservative court long past my lifetime.

    Kavanaugh (58), Gorsuch (56), Jackson (53) and Barrett (51) could all be with us for 30 years or more. So that’s a baked in 3:1 disadvantage until maybe 2053? I’m 54 myself, so it’s unlikely I’ll live to see this.


  • I can’t help you if you continue denying the reality of the situation.

    The highest court in the country has ruled. That’s it. It’s over. They are going to make more gun rulings and I guarantee it will get worse.

    The court DOES NOT CARE what you, or I, or anyone else thinks about their rulings, they don’t have to because they know there’s absolutely no check on their power. They can’t be overturned, the House and Senate won’t impeach them, and Biden will never pack the court (if he did, the next Republican President would just re-pack it the other way.)

    They might get overturned in 50 years, like Roe did, but that seems highly unlikely given how the court is becoming more conservative, not less conservative. In my life there have only been 5 Democratic appointees to the court compared to 14 Republican ones.

    I’m not asking you to LIKE it. I’m asking you to acknowledge that the court and it’s rulings are not illegitimate. They are a function of our founding document and denying that is to deny what it means to be an American.