

agreed - but I just don’t see a future for a super heavy launcher getting refilled in orbit, landing on an airless body, elevator required, soft touchdown, soft launch (long term base plans) i’m being a bit too pragmatic in saying all this though
pragmatic, multidisciplinary creative & full stack dev. I tweet & make art, dev, design, politics; play path of exile. https://marko.tech/


agreed - but I just don’t see a future for a super heavy launcher getting refilled in orbit, landing on an airless body, elevator required, soft touchdown, soft launch (long term base plans) i’m being a bit too pragmatic in saying all this though


probably blue origin. they were supposed to reopen the bidding process and let more companies bud again since spacex is behind. spacex had 4-5 years already and this requires an exceedingly complex system. Boeing, Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Martin’s Orion already visited the moon as well and is on schedule to return in April. china will probably get there in 2030 as well.


not using a starship; it’s far too costly and impractical compared to a standard lightweight lander
same, only when calling a business though


if they sell easy install one/low click installs they’d make a killing.
private browse I suppose


if it was a lower price than the standard model it’d sell more


sigh


let’s hope the canadian company just ignores this

water.


TLDR


so true


starship isn’t practical enough for this…


fuck what he says


this nepo baby should go back to sex criming


no shit - they ruined it for all of us
someone is paying them to add it probably