Did anyone here read the article? Two paragraphs are about Queers for Palestine. The rest is about actual Palestinians trying to fight for LGBT rights. So many people here trying to dunk on how dumb it is to fight for this when it’s the people actually over there fighting for their rights. Are you saying that shouldn’t happen?

Why is this relevant? The article is about Palestinian activists fighting for LGBT rights for Palestine. Yes the rights of LGBT people in Palestine are not great … But that’s literally what this article is about, Palestinians fighting to make it better

Trying to make fallout die? He helped make a show that has done insanely well and brought the fallout series player counts to record highs. You can not like Todd but to claim he’s trying to kill the series is hilarious

deleted by creator

Not really a big deal but it’s funny that this variety article and all the other people reporting on this are using the same line of Francesca being from sex education when she’s not lol. She’s from bad education. It seems like so many websites are just copying from the same source and so they all have the same mistake

The title annoys me because team 0% did already accomplish their goal weeks ago. Sure it was anticlimactic, but with the rules set out for them from the get go, it was done when it came out tth was TAS.

Don’t get me wrong it’s absolutely amazing and so cool the level got beaten. But this accomplishment does not signify team 0% completing their goal.

Also I know it’s just the title of the reddit thread so not annoyed at OP. And I’m only like pedantically fake annoyed lol

I’ve got an ad blocker on mobile and yeah the article goes on wayyyyyyyy longer than what you show there

Not sure I’m seeing what’s fucked up about this. It’s not like they’re using people’s comments as their own work. They link back to this thread. It just seems like a place where they can dump a bunch of their own thoughts related to a topic without posting it here since it’s not necessarily in line with this thread’s topic anymore. And I thought it was an interesting read and appreciated them posting it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Pajama Sam: There’s no need to hide when it’s dark outside

This article doesn’t interpret the Berlin interpretation correctly. The things the article says are “must haves” are actually just “high value factors” as the post says.

This list can be used to determine how roguelike a game is. Missing some points does not mean the game is not a roguelike. Likewise, possessing some points does not mean the game is a roguelike.

So while some of these are deemed important to roguelike, it can be a roguelike without all of those things.

Now personally I think the debate over the genre is silly, and I don’t think the Berlin interpretation is really accurate anymore. But to be fair to it, it does not say a game has to have everything on that list. Spelunky is a roguelike. Idc what anyone says. Just because it isn’t turn/grid based doesn’t mean it isn’t a roguelike. It has most all the other high value factors, and a handful of the low value factors as well.

Because why would a random user not affiliated with the creation of the instance, therefore having no power over the spelling utilized in it, in anyway care

I mean I don’t love either company but I’d argue Google is a much more shit company than epic lol

Is this just an image? I see no news story here

If you’re talking about the whole thing with dolphin almost being released on steam, it wasn’t going to cost money. They weren’t trying to monetize. They were just trying to have the download available on steam

I honestly do love the game but like, this year was stacked lol. I had a blast with it but other stuff was better

I mean porting isn’t an effortless task to be fair.

I’d like to be clear I definitely do not prefer subscriptions to just buying it once. But really there are 2 scenarios here. 1. The game doesn’t exist on mobile at all. 2. It exists and you can play it if you have a Netflix subscription. I wish there was more than that but tbh I feel like I’d pick 2. At least with 2 the devs get more financial support and some more people have access to these excellent games

Well basically these games would likely have not been on mobile at all. Netflix is publishing them for mobile. If I had to guess, I’d say that Netflix approached these devs and offered to publish for them and provide them money for being on their service. For the devs, it’s free money for something they likely weren’t considering in the first place (porting to mobile). I definitely wish the devs would publish themselves (if they have the means) but it’s not how it’s happening unfortunately. And fwiw they are on the play store. You just need to sign in with a Netflix account when the game boots up.

I def do wish that these companies were able to publish it themselves so they didn’t have to go with Netflix, I can agree with that

The games are native on mobile. You need a sub but they aren’t streaming

The games already exist, but not on mobile. I’d agree if they were available on mobile already and then went behind a paywall subscription. If the games would never exist on mobile if Netflix wasn’t paying for them to be there, then I don’t mind as much