![](https://compuverse.uk/pictrs/image/90299d71-fe2c-4172-a855-c208957c55d3.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0d5e3a0e-e79d-4062-a7bc-ccc1e7baacf1.png)
That’s awesome! It’s nice to know it works out sometimes. Congrats!
I am Steve
That’s awesome! It’s nice to know it works out sometimes. Congrats!
There’s nothing anyone can really say about your feeling. That’s entirely subjective and in your own head.
You’d have to be far more specific and objective about your observations to have any kind of meaningful dialogue.
all of them are literally the same.
That’s obviously not true. So if you could explain what you actually mean, that could be helpful.
In my experience, they’re thinking 20-30 cents per hour. And yah, that’s never enough to change someone’s mind. 20-30% that could make a difference, but it’s way too much for them to ever concider.
I’m pretty sure it’s a global Android feature that doesn’t have anything to do with Firefox specifically.
Am I alone in not carding about about inter-series continuity?
Not a criticism. Just wondering if I’m the odd one?
It’s beautiful!
Also. Charge your phone.
Commenting works though!
Or subscription, or freemium, or merch, or raffles. Lots of options beyond that even.
Advertisements distort the market arrangement. When one uses advertisements to generate revenue, it inherently creates a situation where the advertisers are the actual customers. This incentivizes the site toward the needs of the advertisers instead of the users in any situation where those needs don’t align.
So yes, eventually it would be the end of the world. Within a decade or two the site would go to hell. We’re seeing it already with most ad based sites. People are complaining Google is getting bad. We already know that Reddit is. That’s why most of us are here. News sites go to shit, when they distort themselves for advertisers. Example after example of advertising, making site after site worse over time.
The advertising model, is the original sin of the internet.
We need to find another way.
I do. Any questions?
The current version with reversed colors, is all that’s needed. I wouldn’t change it beyond that.
If you suppress it, letting it fester, you’re right. But that’s not what they’re talking about.
They’re describing actually letting it go. Letting the emotions wash over you and dissipate naturally. It may look the same on the outside, but internally it’s very different. It’s by far the best skill for your mental health.
MRI is much longer and louder than CT
There is a save feature.
There’s no such thing as “raw” sausage. Uncooked maybe. But never raw, like carots or stake can be raw.
Sausage is ground meat mixed with all sorts of spices and things. Including yes almost always sugar and salt. Without the extra spices, it’s not sausage anymore. It’s just ground beef, pork, turkey, venison, whatever.
I tend to find them funny, and entertaining.
When a persons response seems far outside the norm, I know it’s not about me anymore. Then I just try to enjoy the show.
When they calm down, I might ask what it was really all about. Which can be constructive sometimes, or just it’ll just send them into another performance. Either way is a different kind of win.
You care about people or you don’t.
That’s obviously and completely wrong. Everyone cares about different people to different degrees, depending on how close and well known they are. It’s not at all binary. If it were, you would by flying around the world to sit at the bed side of every kid with cancer you’ve ever heard of, as if they were your own child.
I would hesitantly say it probably would. They didn’t include that in the scan, but did in the self reporting questions. And found no real difference in either groups self reported empathy toward the other group.
Furthermore, at the self-reported level, we assessed inter-group empathy levels (toward rightists vs leftists), and our results did not reveal any significant difference between the two groups, and rather moderate levels of empathy toward each other.
That combined with the starkly increased measured of empathy for others generally, which was more pronounced than self reporting showed. It would make sense that the same pattern continued, even for the opposite associated group. I would expect rightists to be less empathetic to leftists than self-reported, and leftists to be more empathetic to rightists than self-reported.
Generally no.
A few larger companies do.