You can’t go and kill the guy at a point where you know he has events in his yet. (A person’s “yet” is what is known of their personal future). You have to attack him at a point where you he doesn’t have any events in his yet that you know about. This also means no killing Hitler before April 30th 1945.

Yes.

The break even point would be at a balance of 23.08$. However, if the account balance doesn’t expire, buying your own game to put you over the threshold would be checking the couch cushions for loose change level of desperation.

Difference being: here it’s attributed to one man, Putin. Israel applies it to all Palestinians. Difference couldn’t be more obvious.

Aranaktu looks like he’s a least a kilometer tall. Those children were doomed the moment they sat on those rainbow swings.

We’re part of the general public, and we’ve heard both halves.

Riding a creature. “Daggerfall” had ride-able horses. That’s the oldest example I can think off. But there’s probably something even older than that.

A lot of them are using old, pre-AI tactics, too, going by the image.

“Do your own research” is used to shut up people who are asking for evidence. It marks the end of any sort of productive discussion. Maybe a good response would be to ask “So you don’t have any evidence?”. If the other party doesn’t respond, they look weak, but if they had evidence, they wouldn’t have tried to pull the “Do your own research” bit. When they reply, presumably without any evidence, proceed to ridicule their lack of evidence.

You’re actively getting in the way of stopping a genocide. Of course people are angry at you.

I just checked Wikipedia, and there it also says small profit. Could be caused by how the satellites are being written off, though.

I was being sarcastic. I simply don’t believe that there’s enough money to be made selling satellite internet to support replacing a large constellation of satellites every 5 years. Especially since Starlink’s competitors use higher up satellites, meaning they don’t have to replace their satellites as often.

And they’re running at a loss.

And those people are famously wealthy.

Suppliers will charge whatever gives them the highest profit, and if their costs go up by x, said optimal pricepoint goes up by x/2, assuming a linear correlation between price and demand.

When 2 satellites collide, the pieces don’t all stay on the same altitude. Even though none of them will be in a stable orbit, all it takes is for one piece to smack into a satellite that’s a bit higher up before it de-orbits, and boom, now you’ve got a debris field that won’t de-orbit.

They won’t be able to price landline based connections out as long as they have to replace their satellites every 5 years. I wouldn’t be surprised if they’re running at a loss currently.

Isn’t Starlink also too expensive because you have to replace the satellites every 5 years? As in you’d have to sell to basically everybody on earth to be profitable. And they charge 50Euros a month, almost twice as much as I currently pay, and I’m satisfied with my current provider.

That sounds like a bad idea.

Florida department of “Health”.