

(minutes) earlier post linking the study
(minutes) earlier post linking the study
So many words…
to
oh god please no
wth is all that coloring [in the design samples]
Stop allowing full unfettered access
There’s a decline button. At least privacy settings don’t repeatedly come up again (what this post is about).
Better flood them with interested users than ask for thumbs up on a ticket.
We want to move down to the next line (line feed) but also to the beginning of that line (carriage return) after all.
Unless you open it in Excel. In which case bad things will happen no matter what you have in the CSV…
When did you first hear of Godot?*
I don’t know man. Required field. No fitting option. Guess I’ll leave.
They bought Java (not javascript)
They bought Sun, which “owned” Java and JavaScript.
The trademark was originally issued to Sun Microsystems on 6 May 1997, and was transferred to Oracle when they acquired Sun in 2009.
A Python-specific question is better suited to the [email protected] community instead of the general programming one.
I’ll use a gif with each frame being a different country flag. Then I can access them by frame index.
The link is broken. Looks like code was accidentally pasted there.
https://lukasatkinson.de/2025/net-negative-cursor/%20%20%20%20let%20mut%20bytes%20=%20vec![0u8;%20len%20as%20usize];%20%20%20%20buf.read_exact(&mut%20bytes)?%3B++++++++%2F%2F+Sanitize+control+characters+++++let+sanitized_bytes%3A+Vec%3Cu8%3E+=+bytes.into_iter%28%29+++++++++.filter%28%7C&b%7C+b+%3E=+32+%7C%7C+b+%3D%3D+9+%7C%7C+b+%3D%3D+10+%7C%7C+b+%3D%3D+13%29+%2F%2F+Allow+space%2C+tab%2C+newline%2C+carriage+return++++.collect%28%29%3B
404 Page Not Found
The page you have requested does not exist. Would you like to visit the start page?
Cleaned up link: https://lukasatkinson.de/2025/net-negative-cursor/
Marketing-speak, not saying much at all. Not even a hint in what they “discovered”, what they plan to change, or plan to do. No acknowledgement of previous issues, making me doubt the “working with the incredible global community” as pure marketing-speak.
I also want locally deleted files to be deleted on the server.
Sometimes I even move files around (I believe in directory structure) and again, git deals with this perfectly. If it weren’t for the lossless-to-lossy caveat.
It would be perfect if my script could recognize that just like git does, instead of deleting and reuploading the same file to a different location.
If you were to use Git, deleted files get deleted in the working copy, but not in history. It’s still there, taking up disk space, although no transmission.
I’d look at existing backup and file sync solutions. They may have what you want.
For an implementation, I would work with an index. If you store paths + file size + content checksum you can match files under different paths. If you compare local index and remote you could identify file moves and do the move on the remote site too.
Your git repo might get very big after some time. Especially if you move files.
Moving files does not noticeably increase git repo size. The files are stored as blob objects. Changing their path does not duplicate them.
Can you be more specific? What in what they present is bad use of AI?
What makes you think anyone blindly trusted it?
They pointed out how it was almost correct, and the two places they had to correct. Obviously, they verified it.
There and at other times, they talked about similar approaches of generating a starting point rather than “blindly trusting” or anything like that.
Blazor allows JavaScript like interactions, allows the developer to write in C# but gets rendered serverside
Blazor can compile .NET to Webassembly and run that in the web-browser.
Probably because it’s much simpler to integrate than Jenkins.
Their own CI system ‘Actions’ is in open alpha.
Honestly, I’m glad they didn’t use Jenkins. Managing it is a convoluted mess. (I don’t have experience with Woodpecker CI nor with Forgejo Actions in particular, though.)
It’s not a duplicate URL. You posted an image, they posted a link to the study.
I mainly wanted to give the additional context and discussion, more so than say “has already posted”.
I assume I must have compared a modified date or sth, dunno. Misled by it being shown further down in my feed.