Judges don’t tell a team their facts are wrong, the other team does. Judges decide which of the teams had better argumentation.

I find the judge symbolism interesting and compelling, but moderators are not judges. They’re not making a judgement in place of the citizens by the end.

Rather than only letting two people debate, they could ask for clarifications. If you see them as press, and as representing the citizens, you may even think they have to to fulfill the press code and their responsibility.

I think it’s a question of how you see the debate. What it is, or should be. Is it between the two candidates, and moderators merely give it structure? Or is it a debate with an expectation of truth and trustworthiness, fulfilling the press code, where the moderators would have to at least point out lies or ask for clarifications?

A debate between two candidates has its value, but we can’t deny it strengthens Trumps position as an apparently to many people charismatic liar. Between only two people it’s about who is more charismatic and convincing, not about truthfulness, verifiability. All of those only go as far as the other candidate can establish them.

If many citizens watch only the debate, is that enough to inform them / base their voting [or omission thereof] on?

In the end, it may be understandable to wish for moderators to point out lies. It can be irritating and frustrating to see lies on a podium finding success, without successful, conclusive rebuttal. But that’s not the moderators’ place in the show format as it is.

Disclaimer: I haven’t watched it.

Did they denounce target children before?

“Temu is designed to make this expansive access undetected, even by sophisticated users,” Griffin’s complaint said. “Once installed, Temu can recompile itself and change properties, including overriding the data privacy settings users believe they have in place.”

So just like the majority USAian app out there?

Which apps do that? Because I am certain it’s NOT the majority, and very skeptical about any other apps doing that.

deleted by creator

• I did in the past: Replace .bik intro video file with an “empty” one to skip intros
• I know of, haven’t used: Change game window to be borderless with Borderless Gaming
• IIRC I’ve used Cheat Engine, before it was littered with shit, to speed up an awfully slow singleplayer game
• In Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory (W:ET) I had a whole setup of config scripts for key bindings
• For W:ET server hosting I put configuration into a deliberate, structured set of files (it’s not necessarily obvious between splitting base game and alternateable mod configuration)

So to me, saying “we don’t know if it was sexting,

They may have not known the source and tweet wording. I certainly didn’t.

/edit: I see it’s in the article as well.

I think we’re off a lot better. We have a lot more choice, and much less bad choices.

Adding to

The value of Bitcoin has only increased over time

???

And not only a bit. A fall from 67 to 16.

Will it move the mouse for me?

I think it’s very possible.

With the right causation or correlation, the correct person is identified.

Whether right reason refers to being mad at the person for the related reason or the reason itself being valid and rightful, both are possible.

Right time is related to the cause of anger as well as when the anger takes place. Both is possible to be at the right time.

You can even be angry without any visible indication. There’s also cases where an aggressive response is the right response. Proper response is possible too.

I mean, there’s emojis like bee snuggle fox available

Thank you

Deep Narrative: Experience a story rich with political intrigue and moral dilemmas.

we call it eine Politischintrigenhaftmoralischdilemmaischerfahrung

Steam Store page of PVKK: Planetenverteidigungskanonenkommandant

or Planetenverteidigungskanonenkommandantvideospielsteamshopinformationswunschlistenkaufsseite

What are you referring to as obviously fake? The article about that bot account?

So it was falling for three years

… any text form?

The only way to meaningfully advocate for it after your company already announced their conditions and offerings is to present value gain.

What do you suggest concretely? What should be offered under what conditions? What would that mean as cost? What would the benefit be? How substantial is it?

Reaching out privately to them is certainly going beyond what you are employed for. I don’t know about ill-advised - if you never disclose it or are at least mindful of that. But it’s a personal assessment. You seem to be willing to invest a lot into a single customer, who tries to do something not offered or considered by the company. Whether it’s personal interest, or first a broader better understanding of the use case, I can see how it could be worth or worthwhile. But I wouldn’t get my hopes up about changing the opinions of your company [from their information alone].

Your company offered API access. So there is an interface available. They won’t make it free unless they see and deem it worth it to do so.