This reads like an ad, with the romanticized stories.

We take photos to preserve memories, but selfies feel distinctive for their intimacy.

Feel distinctive; You sure it’s not the wider view angle leading to morphed images?

Will robots work for me as well?

Nintendo and The Pokémon Company filed a lawsuit against Pocketpair in Japan last year, alleging that Palworld infringes on three patents that are related to monster catching gameplay, including summoning Pals by throwing Pal Spheres, and using Pals as vehicles like gliders.

Indication of how protective vs aggressive Nintendo uses it’s patents.

How similar vs novel do you feel pal world is to Pokemon?

Wikipedia says Digimon release 1997, Pokemon 1996.

Is Bill Gates still important in the tech company space?

I was under the impression that he was not active for over a decade. Having left Microsoft, and focusing on more humanitarian efforts. Does he have any influence, or does tech-company-space activity still?

Regional, between 6 and 24 €

https://steamdb.info/app/1030300/

Less distance transporting is a positive side-effect of buying [alternative products] locally.

Is that why he was called OJ Simpson?

Great to see the migration investment, and to this extent.

The article feels very unfocused, light on content, doesn’t it?

If I got it right, they’re answering the why with

• it’s social before gameplay

I’m not sure the other points were about the why

• it’s a platform of experiences
• it’s easy to switch between games compared to their cartridge renting youth
• bad graphics and predatory monetization are no hindrance

This content is for registered subscribers only

Don’t tell me after 14 paragraphs in two scroll pages! They talk about manipulative monetization, and then do this. At least make it obvious at the top.

Thanks for including the rest of the content here.

Have you considered asking OFCOM?

If there responsible for enforcement, they may offer resources or information. Otherwise they should get informed of the need.

They didn’t really disclose much. “We saw suspicious activity” isn’t saying much.

This is big in terms of publicity. That may have even more value than the operative impact.

I recently watched a video where they tested if the replies were generic/context-generic or fed by their own comments.

They replied to comments on their video with a fake ad. And sure enough, after a while, the AI suggested such replies.

Here’s the video

Is this summary helpful?

When the summary is presented there, like that, of course, it seems helpful.

I’m certain the majority of people will respond with “yes”, without checking the user’s post history to verify the summary. The responses will be biased, making the whole thing worse, and giving opportunity to disingenuous marketing and justification.

We can only hope they interpret and use it for that: indicating usefulness, not correctness. Who knows what kind of metrics they use for correctness, if at all, and what type of faults they deem acceptable.

I’d need a banana for scale to see if this is huge or a macro photo of a small thing.

Maybe they will if someone or sie org forces then sit it?

If one country required non disclosure of backdoors and another requires disclosure, who wins?

“barely off the ground”

How slow did it fly? 0.1 meters per second?

aiiiiiii!!