

The only thing they have ever done well is host a Q&A board and incubate niche communities.
Then they stopped doing that well.
The only thing they have ever done well is host a Q&A board and incubate niche communities.
Then they stopped doing that well.
My workplace calls it “n-jinx”, we know its nonstandard but its still what is understood by the team.
That was fast!
Edit: its great to see the games they highlight with the cover illustrations. They cover a variety of genres and all look like quality games with interesting design choices.
Interesting to see the doom recreation. The commentary in the subtitles is fascinating.
MPL is a weak copyleft license.
If they make changes to your files then they have to share their changes to those files with a reciprocal license.
It has no impact on the licencing of the rest of their project.
I understand proprietary licenses and the business models they support, I also understand open source licenses and the business models they support.
If they they published paid binaries and free source code I would support them (morally), or if they published free binaries and free source code and ran a patreon I would support them (morally).
But to fork GPL code and hold the derived source ransom? Not cool.
Its an impressive read!