• 1 Post
  • 35 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 4th, 2023

help-circle



  • Communism doesn’t mandate a single-party government though. Single-party government is just authoritarianism. That’s why there are, and have been, communist parties in democratic countries.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism

    “Communism (from Latin communis ‘common, universal’) is a political and economic ideology whose goal is the creation of a communist society, a socioeconomic order centered on common ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange that allocates products in society based on need. A communist society entails the absence of private property and social classes, and ultimately money and the state. Communism is a part of the broader socialist movement.”

    By this definition, PRC is decidedly not communist as the common people do not own the means of production; products in society are not solely allocated based on need; private property exists; social classes exist; and money exists.

    Whose definition of communism are you relying upon?


  • Salty Persimmons?
    Spare Parts?
    Significant Pasteurisation?
    Salacious Pragmatism?
    Seven Pills?
    Settled Pieces?
    Startled Poltergeist?
    Scalded Privates?
    Serendipitous Pimples?
    Spelled Poorly?
    Sour Plums?
    Sexual Prowess?
    Semitic Principles?
    Santa’s Profile?
    Sextet Polka?
    Salmon Pendant?
    Saucy Politics?
    Schadenfreude Pig?
    Smithsonian Pedestal?
    Soggy Pants?
    Small Penis?
    Shouted Preamble?
    Sorting Place?
    Shifty Panda?
    Spandex Poll?
    Sentient Pentagram?
    Silent Parable?
    Stationary Pigeon?
    Smelly Pugilist?
    Shoddily Preened?
    Starter’s Pistol?
    Symbiotic Parasite?
    Self-Preservation?
    Synergy Pyramid?
    Soot Pole?
    Semblance Provider?
    Scunthorpe Party?
    Smashing Pumpkins?
    Seaside Porgy?
    Steely Pumpernickel?
    Storage Purpose?
    Seemingly Perfect?

    We may never know



  • Weapon degradation seems to be a serious and genuine complaint that a lot of people have with BotW and TotK but for some reason it never seemed to bother me as it has others. I totally understand the criticism but frankly I always had a full stock of good quality weapons - particularly with the Fuse function in TotK - and never ran low or out of decent weapons on hand.

    I think they were implemented to try to force gamers to think about other options to take down enemies rather than brute-forcing every battle which appeals to me, but it seems to have angered a significant proportion of people. From my perspective, it helps to engender the puzzler aspect of Zelda games in a novel way - viewing battles as a puzzle to be solved for maximum efficiency rather than how well you can strike and dodge.





  • I know exactly what you mean. When I (cis man) was freshly 18 in the 00’s I was indecently assaulted by an older woman in a bar when I walked past her and her group of friends and I never reported it. I have friends who experienced similar who never reported it either. When I told my friends that night what had just happened I was told I was lucky to be non-consensually grabbed by a woman. I tried to tell myself that was the case for a long time; it took many years before I came to realise that I was assaulted and, by that point, there was nothing I could do about it.


  • Not sure how it works in USA but can’t you elect to not have your employer withhold your taxes for you and then have to pay your annual tax in a lump sum at the end of the fiscal year? That’s part of standard HR taxation forms here in Australia and some people do it in order to invest what they would otherwise be paying in taxes then divest at tax time, pay their tax, and hold onto the capital gains from their investment that they’d otherwise not have had access to. Sure they pay capital gains tax on that but it’s still a net windfall if their investments accrue.



  • Coal is dying as an investment but existing coal plants will likely run for a long while.

    I think that might vary from place to place.

    Here in Australia our most recent new coal-fired power plant was built in 2009 and very many big ones we rely heavily on are already past their original planned lives. We’re lucky to have such good solar generation here though that even residential rooftop solar is kicking some serious goals but have been leaning more on gas for base load distribution (trust me, we’re not gonna meet our targets). Coal isn’t gonna last too much longer here, but we’re not gonna be carbon neutral for a VERY, very long time.


  • Yeah, this is the right way to go about it. Don’t hold onto your big hit song for the encore. I’ve been to shows where they did the fakeout standard encore leaving the stage and the crowd stayed pretty quiet; then they had to sheepishly come back onstage to little applause to play the big hits.

    Artists should prepare an encore in case the crowd wants it, but don’t hold onto your big songs for that - encores should be deep tracks that are rarely played or acoustic/re-arranged versions of popular songs. One of the best encores I saw was Devildriver (heavy/death metal band) whose encore consisted of a three-song acoustic/piano medley. Super cool way to end the night!





  • The Israeli government didn’t, but the Israeli population did. The strongest argument the public was making against the war was to bring the hostages home. Now that they’ve got that they have a much larger domestic social licence to continue the genocide. It was a real ‘rock and a hard place’ decision for Hamas given that Trump began alluding to the idea that the US would directly enter the war somehow if they didn’t agree to the plan.