I can see no fair reason to refuse it!

it’s totalitarianism vs freedom to have intelligent discourse

bigotry isn’t “intelligent discourse”, and calling out bigots for their bigotry isn’t “totalitarianism."

This is referred to as the Streisand Paradox, wherein one blames Barbra Streisand for something, thereby triggering the Streisand Effect. 

This is different, of course, than mentioning Streisand and Cloony together, which produces The Perfect Streistorm.

Or go insane trying!

A Siberian Gulag will do that

Is there really a difference between those two things?

A British MP, you say… oooo

You can just set your phone to wipe after X wrong attempts and do that, ending the issue.

Or how about, “quotes Hitler”?

at least it would be a cool story ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

you can almost certainly just rent them for a short time.

from another comment:

https://gravity.co/

it’s 2023, and… yeah… this story sounds like bad sci-fi, so it’s probably true. I’d read he article, but I’m afraid I’d see the word “unobtainum” and throw my phone across the room.

does the Lebanese government think seeing all that pink (omg, so much pink in that movie) is going to make people gay? lmao

really, though, that movie was so pink, it cured my heartburn

damn, beat me to it

he IS the circus.

the three (wedding) rings, the freak show (of a family), the hall of mirrors (of election fraud claims), the clown show (of supporters), the (legal) trapeze act, AND the elephant (in the room)!

they don’t give a shit about the people this will affect; they’re just abusing a wedge issue to win elections. it’s all about manipulation and power.

is the Deep State™ in the room with you right now?

Tech companies have fought against gag orders many times before and been supported online for doing so.

do you have any sources/evidence that show twitter doing this?