And precisely the same applies to critics of anarchist theory as well, have you read them? I’ve read both, and the critics have made better arguments than the proponents for 200+ years.
This comment says enough about this conversation. They make better arguments in your opinion. You think your opinion is everything though.
That’s obtuse. Everyone bases everything on their opinion. You develop your opinion with information of the world. You’re likewise basing everything on your opinion. Heliocentrists make better arguments than geocentrists in my opinion too, doesn’t make that opinion wrong. Human reason is just the process of refining our opinions of the world.
I read the theory, I weighed it against the evidence of my experience, I came to conclusions. When theory conflicts with evidence, evidence takes precedence.
This comment says enough about this conversation. They make better arguments in your opinion. You think your opinion is everything though.
That’s obtuse. Everyone bases everything on their opinion. You develop your opinion with information of the world. You’re likewise basing everything on your opinion. Heliocentrists make better arguments than geocentrists in my opinion too, doesn’t make that opinion wrong. Human reason is just the process of refining our opinions of the world.
I read the theory, I weighed it against the evidence of my experience, I came to conclusions. When theory conflicts with evidence, evidence takes precedence.