… 🫩

  • voodooattack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I read a post that said he couldn’t go to war without a vote from congress, was that wrong?

    Edit: I’m not a US citizen so I’m not sure

    • selfAwareCoder@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s more complicated than it should be, only Congress can declare we are at war, however over the past 200 years they have passed laws allowing the president to do things before that vote out of a sense of being flexible and Congress being slow , and keep allowing more and more things, I think currently the president can do almost anything with the military so long as Congress leaders are told and they then can vote to stop it, instead of voting to approve it.

    • 2piradians@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      1 day ago

      The constitution gives Congress the exclusive power to formally declare war.

      That said, Congress hasn’t declared war since 1942, yet we’ve obviously taken part in many wars since then.

      Sadly there just hasn’t been enough Congressional support to retaliate against a president for jumping to military action without authorization. And it doesn’t help that the average American doesn’t know that the president is not allowed to just deploy troops at will (in most cases, Iran included).

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        23 hours ago

        If the president can do it without consequences, then he is allowed. Turns out words on paper mean nothing.