• dil@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Idk, its less subjective than the top comment summaries on reddit from users

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I see no reason to engage with, or trust anything created by, a bullshit generator. If Digg claims to “care” about the humans, then making the top comment into a brick wall (which has zero accountability) is a funny way of showing it.

      But then again, I’m sure their privacy policy also says they care about your privacy.

      • dil@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        its not a comment its in the post and its alpha, they’ll prob add an option for it to be closed by default.

        • LWD@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You’re right, it’s not a comment. It supersedes comments. Digg is literally showing you an AI-first ecosystem.

          This isn’t some UI glitch. It’s a feature they stuck front and center. Digg is trying to start a second honeymoon period with users. Why do you think things would get better after that?

    • dil@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Not like itll prevent ppl from clicking on articles that alrady werent