Let S1 be the set of people who voted for Biden.
Let S2 be the set of people who voted for Trump’s second term.
S1 ∩ S2 ≠ {}
If that’s not helpful, let’s try code:
s1 = getPeopleWhoVotedForBiden()
s2 = getPeopleWhoVotedForTrumpsSecondTerm()
if (x for x in s1 if x in s2 > 0):
print("There are more than enough people qualifying for for what I said")
And lastly, to reformulate the sentence:
There are lots of people who in 2020 voted for Biden and in 2024 voted for Trump.
hah, you looked up an intersection symbol, nice. And now I just cant help myself since you gave me that response…
So of 152 million votes cast, you’d like to show a sample size of just 1 person or more proves your hypothesis? seems pretty biased against the null hypothesis.
And your restatement of your hypothesis:
“There are lots of people who in 2020 voted for Biden and in 2024 voted for Trump.”
You are proving “lots” with > 1? thats just not what “lots” means in english.
That sentence makes no sense.
Let’s put it into math instead:
If that’s not helpful, let’s try code:
s1 = getPeopleWhoVotedForBiden() s2 = getPeopleWhoVotedForTrumpsSecondTerm() if (x for x in s1 if x in s2 > 0): print("There are more than enough people qualifying for for what I said")
And lastly, to reformulate the sentence:
There are lots of people who in 2020 voted for Biden and in 2024 voted for Trump.
hah, you looked up an intersection symbol, nice. And now I just cant help myself since you gave me that response…
So of 152 million votes cast, you’d like to show a sample size of just 1 person or more proves your hypothesis? seems pretty biased against the null hypothesis.
And your restatement of your hypothesis: “There are lots of people who in 2020 voted for Biden and in 2024 voted for Trump.”
You are proving “lots” with > 1? thats just not what “lots” means in english.
And I think we’re done here.
You are right, I had trouble defining “lots” or “enough” in math or code :)