• squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Let’s put it into math instead:

      Let S1 be the set of people who voted for Biden. Let S2 be the set of people who voted for Trump’s second term.

      S1 ∩ S2 ≠ {}

      If that’s not helpful, let’s try code:

      s1 = getPeopleWhoVotedForBiden()
      s2 = getPeopleWhoVotedForTrumpsSecondTerm()
      
      if (x for x in s1 if x in s2 > 0):
        print("There are more than enough people qualifying for for what I said")
      

      And lastly, to reformulate the sentence:

      There are lots of people who in 2020 voted for Biden and in 2024 voted for Trump.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        30 minutes ago

        hah, you looked up an intersection symbol, nice. And now I just cant help myself since you gave me that response…

        So of 152 million votes cast, you’d like to show a sample size of just 1 person or more proves your hypothesis? seems pretty biased against the null hypothesis.

        And your restatement of your hypothesis: “There are lots of people who in 2020 voted for Biden and in 2024 voted for Trump.”

        You are proving “lots” with > 1? thats just not what “lots” means in english.

        And I think we’re done here.