Four months ago, we asked Are LLMs making Stack Overflow irrelevant? Data at the time suggested that the answer is likely “yes:”

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Free to use” on a VC-backed service just means you’re the product. I am accusing them of the same thing I’m accusing each VC-backed service: That they exploit our efforts to cash out and then sell the service for someone who will enshittify it for profit.

    Also, what do you mean “easily downloadable”? Can anyone download the entire corpus of SO in a way that they could set up their own SO with the same content to bootstrap them?

    • vermaterc@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Also, what do you mean “easily downloadable”? Can anyone download the entire corpus of SO in a way that they could set up their own SO with the same content to bootstrap them?

      have you seen: https://archive.org/details/stackexchange

      That they exploit our efforts to cash out and then sell the service for someone who will enshittify it for profit.

      Can you give an example of this enshittification for profit?

        • vermaterc@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          So I agree, I thought you are talking about some profit enshittification on Stack Overflow

          • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’m not following SO practices, but I it will come for it as well. It’s inevitable. Those who paid billions for it will require a ROI