Do we need any more proof Python is superior?
(I’m ^joking, ^I ^love ^Rust)
a compile-time error is highly preferable to a run-time error
Hey at least it’s not JavaScript which is perpetually high on crack with Object object
1 + 1 = “11”.
[] + [] = “”
You wouldn’t typecast a car.
I may be on the wrong side of history but I can’t see what other role a car could get in the film industry except vehicle.
For our American friends: the Opel Corsa is a car.
For the Brits, it’s a Vauxhall Corsa.
For everyone : it’s a sh’tbox (never again)
C when I cast a
char * *to achar * * const: okC when I cast a
char * *to achar * const *: okC when I cast a
char * *to achar const * *: WTFC when I cast a
char * *to achar const * const *: okPlease stop, I have CPTSD.
You know, I always wondered what the original image looked like, and even trusty Know Your Meme doesn’t show it. It looked like this:
And that’s why I don’t use Python for anything more than simple scripts
It works and is a pile of jank - Python
It doesn’t work and is a pile of jank - C++
You violated gods laws with how bad your code is and it still runs (right through the wall) - C
In bigger projects, you tend to miss type safety really bad, really fast. Rust has it built in, Python can have it bolted on. That’s simply one of the many aspects to consider when choosing your programming language.
But don’t worry about it too much. If one thing’s for sure, it’s that you will regret that choice in any case.
