Interesting theory for what might have been another motivation behind the API changes. After all, Sam Altman (CEO of OpenAI) is a member of the Reddit board. What do you think?

edit: this is not my article by the way

  • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It doesn’t make sense to me, AI companies already have reddit data, language models have been on the training for years, blocking access now wouldn’t change anything from that point of view.

    It’s much more likely reddit wants to monetize mobile access before the IPO, to please investors, killing 3rd party apps is the only way for them to have full control on mobile access.

  • Izzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought it was obvious this was the case. Twitter and Reddit are unhappy that AI language models have used all this data for training, but didn’t get paid for it. Personally I don’t even consider it “their” data to begin with even if they can claim legal ownership of it. But they want to get paid obscene amounts of money for data that was created by the goodwill of their users.

    • ActuallyASeal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not their data. If you scrape Reddit for the comments are reposted them somewhere else Reddit wouldn’t be able to come after you with a copyright violation lawsuit.

      Any potential copyright is still owned by the original user with Reddit having a license to sublicense for “syndication, broadcast, distribution, or publication by other companies, organizations, or individuals who partner with Reddit.”

      They would have to come after you with a ToS contract violation or maybe some kind of Computer Fraud and Misuse allegations.

      • Izzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I completely agree it isn’t their data. They still want money for data that isn’t theirs.

        • ActuallyASeal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sorry if I seemed argumentative. I was trying to state that it wasn’t just your opinion that they don’t own user data but it is a fact they don’t own user data.

  • supernovae@readit.buzz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve heard the inverse reasoning that the API is limited because of OpenAI crawling it - which makes no sense if CEO is part of reddit board.

    I just don’t care at this point ;)

    • meli nasa@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, but the reasoning in the post is that OpenAI has already profited from the data, and might have a better position to negotiate special access with them than smaller companies, thus reducing competition.

  • simple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t get it, it’s not like Reddit is a hard website to crawl without an API. I can write a script to crawl a website in an afternoon with something like Selenium, and they can’t stop me. AI companies already have a big enough dataset from Reddit, I doubt they’ll invest in the API at all.

    • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, AI devs using API is just bs reason, you can crawl any site that doesn’t require login so easily. And reddit doesn’t want to limit robot crawling because they would lose Google results also.