• sucrerey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    we had an intern ask AI what it could to to completely enshittify the browser. the AI simply responded, “put me in coach!”

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      They don’t want to buy the browser. They want to buy the brand and the users. Chrome makes up over half the browser market. Think of all the data they could extract from Chrome users. It would cost significantly more to fork chromium and grow the user base to a point where they could extract anything valuable from them, and that’s assuming they’d be successful enough to make it happen.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      No, MS just wants to expand their monopoly, but “MS buying most common browser, after antitrust laws already forbid internet explorer” doesnt ring so well.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I suspect Altman has ambitions beyond being Microsoft’s cat’s paw, though it may be that that’s all he really is once the shouting is over.

      • TON618@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        I like to think if people want whatever it is OpenAI thinks browsers need AI for, the userbase will manifest itself.

  • neclimdul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    5 days ago

    Great! Now not only can chrome eat all my system memory, it can use all my GPU memory at the same time! It’s genius!

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Likely it’ll use the cloud for processing, you’ll just get really hard-to-opt-out AI features, like “prompt by default” and “AI autocomplete”, which you can only “snooze” as they’ll automatically be turned back on the moment there’s a “great new feature”, like putting a filter on by default on image generators to fool the eye that it’s made by real artists.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    When a company considers buying Chrome because it could help them extend the reach of their product, they are fucking drunk and need to go home. This would be like buying the state of Nevada so you could put up billboards all over Las Vegas.

  • uawarebrah@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 days ago

    This can’t happen. Not because I think google is doing a wonderful job, but it’s got serious market share now. Basically a monopoly. It needs to leave the hands of for profit companies and be transitioned to a foundation.

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    And if you thought there was some natural end point to enshittification, here’s your evidence that there’s no such thing.

  • rippersnapper@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’ve said this before and will say it again. The only tech companies that should be allowed to buy Chrome are Canonical and its equivalents.