A jury has found a delivery driver not guilty in the shooting of a YouTube prankster who was following him around a mall food court earlier this year

  • TechyDad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    From the description of the incident, it definitely sounded like he feared for his life. A 6 foot something guy keeps advancing on him, asking why he’s thinking of the guy’s penis. He tells the guy to leave him alone multiple times, but the guy keeps advancing. He retreats multiple times, but the guy keeps at it. He even tries knocking the phone out of the guy’s hand, but the guy keeps at it.

    It definitely sounds like the guy was afraid of where this was going and tried all of the non-lethal options (retreat, tell the person to stop) before resorting to pulling out his gun. The YouTube “pranker” has nobody to blame but himself. He should have stopped when asked instead of repeatedly pressing the defendant for a YouTube “prank” video.

    (I use “prank” in quotes because I don’t consider this type of thing a real prank. It’s just a guy acting like an idiot and calling it “a prank.” A real prank should leave all involved laughing when it’s revealed, not leave one person fearing for their life.)

    • jimbo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      From the description of the incident, it definitely sounded like he feared for his life.

      No it fucking doesn’t. The whole thing lasted less than 30 seconds and the driver never tried to retreat. He told the prankster no a few times, tried to swat the phone out of his hands, and then shot him. It’s not shocking that the jury had a difficult time coming up with a verdict.

      • TechyDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The driver did try to retreat:

        In the video, Colie says “stop” three different times and tries to back away from Cook, who continues to advance.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Well like the article said, he fucked up by shooting immediately after drawing the weapon, instead of giving Cook (the YouTuber) a chance to see the gun and finally back off. I agree with their decision to keep him in jail because of that one simple fact. The guy should have warned him that he was going to shoot if Cook didn’t back down.

      • Ducktape@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        This is wrong and will firmly land you on the wrong side of the law in many places. Pulling a gun is a last resort to defend yourself when de-escalation doesn’t work. You pull the gun when you’ve already determined that you have to fire it. Otherwise you’re just escalating and making the situation more dangerous for yourself and any bystanders. This is also why I don’t carry a gun in the first place even though I might legally be allowed to.

        • Psythik@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          Hey I never said that he should draw the gun before the warning. Warn first, then draw if they still keep advancing.