What alternatives do people have to monetize software in a more ethical way?

I particularly don’t understand the funding that some software receive. What they have to grant to receive those funds?

I also search for some type of monetization “model” better than donations, but more ethical than ads.

If it’s too much to explain I would be grateful for terms or books that I could search later.

  • HappinessPill@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Cloud services or features monetization are interesting, I’ve seen some companies do a community or a local version and the business version with more features.

    • *dust.sys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      The slippery slope that projects taking this approach fall into boils down to ‘let’s put all our new features behind a business version and never add them to the community version until they become 2 totally different code bases’

      • HappinessPill@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        What about a modular software, a base version and the modules are paid ? It would maybe avoid ramification? And the user would have more freedom.

      • HappinessPill@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I always imagined some sort of IP royalty, like you have an idea and implement it, then if someone build something over it for profit they need to pay a fixed percentage otherwise it would be free to use basically.