• Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Redis is also on the list, but not Valkey. Gitea is on the list, but not Forgejo. Still nice to see governments endorsing the open-source-ish software they know and FOSS principles, though!

    • madame_gaymes@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I imagine the list will be dynamic. Those projects might be on a list somewhere, just haven’t been vetted yet by their standards. Start with the source projects, then dive through the forks.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      To be fair, I know redis and gitea (barely, gitlab is way more popular) and not the other two. Enterprise support and name recognition are quite important for government usage.

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        Valkey was created recently as Redis changed their license, having clauses which made the user choose between being “discriminatory against users of the software that use proprietary software within their stack, as the license requires the open-sourcing of every part interacting with the service, which under these circumstances might not be possible” or being non-commercial. Forgejo was created when Gitea decided to go the JetBrains route a few years ago. It’s since absorbed Gitea’s clout.