I hope this post is not too off topic. I thought that it would be nice to see the address of all the small self-hosted instances of Lemmy (1~5 users).

    • tyfi@wirebase.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is there a way to host with high availability? Or is that a kubernetes feature?

      • kelvie@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        K8s is just a huge abstraction over your clusters, the real question is if the software/containers support HA.

        • tyfi@wirebase.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve been meaning to test it for a while now, but have just been running VMs/Docker. Will check it out.

      • Philip@endlesstalk.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can definitely have high availibillity without kubernetes, but its easier(For me atleast) with kubernetes.

          • Philip@endlesstalk.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            For container orchestration, which is mostly what k8s provides, then you could use docker swarm or nomad. You could use docker-compose with multiple replicas of the wanted container + a load balancer to divide the load.

            In general I don’t think k8s/k3s is needed for hosting lemmy yet, but since I have a setup for k3s, it is easier for me to use it.

    • blazarious@mylem.me
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      how do you handle the sled state for pictrs with 2 nodes? I’ve been having some trouble with it.

      • Philip@endlesstalk.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have only 1 container of pictrs running(with no scaling) and are using longhorn for storage, so if the pictrs container switches node, then longhorn handles it for me.

        • blazarious@mylem.me
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I see, thanks. What volume(s) are you persisting that way exactly? I mean the internal path that pictrs is using.

          • Philip@endlesstalk.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The internal path, I’m persisting is /mnt, but I also use an older version of pictrs(0.3.1). Think the newer version uses a different path.

            I also needed to add the following for the pictrs container to work correctly.

              securityContext:
                runAsUser: 991
                runAsGroup: 991
                fsGroup: 991