• chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 days ago

    Yeah, I’m sure the events described in the OP post were satisfying on some level but a crash is a bad outcome and intentionally antagonizing the tailgater probably made it more likely to happen.

    • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      24 days ago

      I mean it sucks for the person who got crashed into, but it is still the tailgater’s responsibility not to crash into people (and also not to tailgate).

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        imo you can’t really compartmentalize blame that way, OP couple still did something wrong by prioritizing a personal grievance over the potential safety of everyone else on the road, even if it’s through indirect influence on the mental state of someone who is more at fault. Driving is too dangerous to be acting like that.

        • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          You also can’t make those two things equivalent. It’s not bad or wrong to slow down your car with a tailgater behind you. It is bad and wrong to tailgate and rear end someone.

          • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            24 days ago

            I’m not saying they’re equivalent, but I am saying that intentionally antagonizing any other driver in order to retaliate for something is in fact wrong.