• SippyCup@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      11 days ago

      I frankly don’t want my tax dollars going to “those people.” Everybody knows they’re just going to use it on Busch light and cigarettes.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 days ago

      Yeah, I’m guessing we will never see any Faux segments on how that one farmer saved up some of his handout and {shock, horror!} used it to {clutches pearls} buy steak. And {collapses on fainting couch} LOBSTER!

      It is so weird to me how the people that supposedly loooove the “free market” lose their minds the minute they see someone select their own food when given food benefits? The same people that fall all over themselves worshipping utter slime like Donvict just because he happens to be wealthy and think he should never have to face any consequences want to police the nutritional intake of the very poorest people…

      https://www.mediamatters.org/washington-post/ny-bill-barring-food-stamp-recipients-luxury-food-items-comes-straight-fox-news

      • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        Meth would probably be less popular in rural communities if we stopped farmer subsidies. There’s no data to show that, but let’s assume and do it anyways just to make sure. Can’t waste those tax dollars on drugs that don’t make corporations money!

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        It’s because they believe that money is a reflection of how good you are as a person. So if someone needs food benefits, then they are a shitty person, and should be punished for it.

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    11 days ago

    Vast majority of this funding will get vacuumed up by corporate farms and continue to leave most small family/independents out to dry

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 days ago

        I’m not so sure that’s true. There is a shit load of land used to grow corn to make ethanol that’s farmed by independent farmers. In the US most farmland is used for soy beans and corn for livestock feed or fuel. It wouldn’t be a simple or cheap undertaking, but that last could be utilized more efficiently to directly or indirectly fees people.

        I would also bet there are enough people that would love to be farmers that can’t because land isn’t available or cheap that would step up if large farm operations were broken up. That’s pure speculation, but even if one mega farm were split 4 ways, that would still be an improvement to the current situation.

        • Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          Well, then farming made up more than 15% of the work force, today that number is less than 2%. Because large production farms became common.

          • JohnnyFlapHoleSeed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            And we had none of the efficiency, gmo’s, and a fraction of the available laborers, and were using smaller amounts of land for farming.

            • EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              The efficiency comes at scale, not diffuse small farms.

              GMOs yes.

              Modern farming is less labor-intensive, not sure on your point there.

              Ag land use down 21.7% 1950-2002 Source. Downward trend continues through 2024 Source.

  • thesohoriots@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    11 days ago

    "What we’re doing is we’re taking a relatively small portion of that [money we made off tariffs], and we’re going to be giving and providing it to the farmers in economic assistance.“

    You’ve got to remember that these are just simple farmers. These are people of the land. The common clay of the New West. You know… morons.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Well, hopefully that’s after the midterms and if they don’t like it, well fuck it. Donvict won’t care as long as he has a compliant Congress to kowtow to every bullshit decree he bleats out on his Xitter knockoff.

  • caffinatedone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 days ago

    So, he’s taking our money that we’re forced to pay due to his stupid tariffs and is using some of it to payoff his supporters who he screwed over with those same tariffs. So, forcing everyone else to clean up his messes. Classic trump.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 days ago

      We’ll have a concept of a plan in two weeks.

      But first: let’s talk more about Gatsby parties and ballrooms…

    • myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 days ago

      Well. Trump is using the income from the tariffs to pay the farmers. This is America first at its best. We, the people, pay the tariffs and then that money is used to pay the farmers. The farmers then sale their crops to major corporations. The major corporations the charge us more in the stores to cover the cost of the tariffs we, the people, have to pay. It’s brilliant!!!

  • DeceasedPassenger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 days ago

    Seeing this after reading about our military spending approaching one trillion $… It’s a pittance. About 2% of the military budget. And as someone else said, most will be gobbled by corps. What a joke.

  • etherphon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 days ago

    From his own pocket right? Because his stupid decisions put them in that situation. I would like to see what percentage of money goes to small farms and what money goes to huge corporate farms.

    boosting the farm safety net

    Oh nice that they get one but no one fucking else does.

    • Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      Well, without them we all die of starvation, so, yeah they should have a safety net. Unless you and everyone you know wants to become a farmer, mass production farms are how we feed billions of people.

      • etherphon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        Of course, but from what I’m understanding these subsidies are going to the farmers who’s soybeans weren’t bought by China because of Trump’s tariffs so they weren’t domestic food to begin with. Now they will probably rot somewhere instead. Starvation never entered the picture, this is all about money. I’d love to own a farm, sure.

        • Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 days ago

          Starvation never entered the picture because there is a safety net and has been one since the dust bowl. Farmgate value for most products is terrible which is why they get so many subsidies and tax breaks.

          • etherphon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 days ago

            It’s a shame their products aren’t valued more, since they are the raw materials for so much including life. I still don’t support bailing out farmers who voted for this. I guess I would rather bail out farmers than bankers or oil barons or ranchers, as if I have a choice. Anyways, we can’t be sure this money is even going to the right people with this admin.

  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 days ago

    I’m trying to figure out here how much farmland is actually owned by farming families and not corporate entities or corporations operating under the “family” banner while being owned by a family that owns shitloads of farms, but I can’t find an honest answer here and the definition of family seems fucking dubious everywhere I’ve looked.