• Luci@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    It’s because Mint used to be Ubuntu without the fuss. Now Ubuntu is Ubuntu without the fuss and mint is Ubuntu with broken packages.

    The funny part is that Mint was always just Ubuntu with broken packages.

    Edit: I think I hurt some feelings

    • n2burns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      What packages are broken? I haven’t run into any.

      P.S. I think Snaps are now the fuss, so I still think Mint is Ubuntu with the fuss.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Mint is what Ubuntu should of been. Ubuntu is kind of a dumpster fire that everyone abandoned.

      • Jestzer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I agree that Linux Mint is closer to what the vocal Linux desktop community would like to see, but Ubuntu is anything but abandoned. Where I work, both my coworkers (excluding myself) and customers are either using RHEL or Ubuntu. That’s it. Sure, everyone on Lemmy and Reddit swears against Ubuntu and has no need for plain-RHEL, but a lot more of the non-vocal Linux community is using Ubuntu. I prefer Pop!_OS, but that’s besides the point.

        Source: Ubuntu is anywhere between 4th and 6th place on these charts:

        https://distrowatch.com/dwres-mobile.php?resource=popularity