• brbposting@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Indeed.

    It is good to design to account for stupidity, or in these cases design around known limitations (eyesight in poor conditions, visibility from a driver’s seat).

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It is good to design to account for stupidity

      Is the rock or sign putting people in danger? I’d argue they account for stupidity by stopping the people who aren’t paying attention and shouldn’t be driving right now.

      The dangerous driver is stopped on an inanimate object instead of causing an accident and no one is hurt.

      • dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        30 days ago

        Correct answer.

        Incidentally, but not at all coincidentally, this is precisely why Target stores always have those red concrete spheres in front of the doors. Which are typically nearly exactly the same height and thus have the same potential amount of visibility/invisibility below a driver’s sightline as this rock. It’s to prevent morons from crashing their vehicles through the doors.

        The rock(s) pictured are not even in the parking lot like this Wal Mart pole. If you leave the road, it is reasonable to expect that you will encounter obstacles.

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          Not so much morons as targeted attacks. Same reason malls (remember malls?) have those great big planters placed randomly on the floors, to stop vehicles that made it past the bollards. Defensive architecture, its a fascinating and extremely depressing subdiscipline.