• Alaknár@lemm.ee
    1·
    18 hours ago

    You seem to be confused. We’re talking about an “OS for the masses”. What you’re talking about is so far beyond the “high end for the top tier enthusiasts” that it’s not even funny.

      • Alaknár@lemm.ee
        1·
        15 hours ago

        Sure, mate. 128 GB of RAM is clearly “for the masses”. :D

        To quote the classic: “the best thing about Linux is the community. The worst thing about Linux is the community”.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          1·
          15 hours ago

          Did you even read what I said?

          If Windows needs more than 128gb of ram then it’s not for the masses because the masses have less than that

          • Alaknár@lemm.ee
            1·
            14 hours ago

            What are you trying to argue here, mate?

            We’re talking about OSes for the average user. You said that Windows with 128 GB is “not stable and not ready out of the box, unlike Linux”.

            Then you said “if it doesn’t work on that, then it’s not for the masses”.

            So what exactly is your point?