- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or # to comment.
Wtf
There are so many more options.
.container.wrapper.inner-wrapper.outer-wrapper.rapper.notorious-big.2pac
.wrappyMcWrap
Edit: dammit I’m hungry now
Hold up, those names are much too descriptive.
div.w
div.w2
<div> <div> <div></div> </div> </div>div {} div div {} div div div {}It’s divy mc divface
Wait, that last one. It’s a syntax I don’t recognize. What is this slightly less nonsensical design?
Isn’t this simply CSS?
Yep. You’re right.
I couldn’t possibly think anyone would do that with CSS which is why it caught me off guard.
Perfect! 👩🍳 💋
Our organization has perfected file naming. When something doesn’t belong in a specific area, it goes into the file named Misc. When that got too big, Misc2 was created.
I have this in one of my global userstyles:
#page, #Body, .Item /* please stay away from web dev */And then there are things like
<div class="h1"(and actual h1) with background-color (well, somepandatoo). A text element needs no background-color, that’s a container-element thing.
