• Questy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    2 months ago

    The preamble of the article clarifies that documents showing that his advisors told him if he kept the documents he would be charged, have been unsealed. The obvious importance being that he cannot use the defence of, “Who knew?!”

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Regular people don’t get to use being unaware of laws as a defense so it shouldn’t even matter.

      But it does apparently because he is a rich narcissist.

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It was already ruled that Jr was too dumb to have colluded with Russia despite their best efforts to work with him during his dad’s campaign.

      • ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        The argument isn’t that he was unaware of the law but that he was unaware he was violating it. In order to be convicted of mishandling the classified documents it has to be proven that he did it intentionally. The law is forgiving for accidental mishandling.

    • geekworking@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      It refutes more than just playing dumb. It also confirms that all of his magic declassification excuses are bullshit and he knows it. He also used promises of a pardon to convince the guy to do things that both knew were illegal. Textbook definition of criminal conspiracy and corruption.