• nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    On the other hand, landfills leak contaminants to the soil and water, produce a lot of methane, and probably other things too. I’d also argue that they give a illusion of a problem solved, and lead people and companies into not wanting to reduce trash production.

    • odium@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      There’s also the fact that a lot of your trash doesn’t go to landfills, but instead gets shipped to developing countries where they often dump it into Wall-E style open air trash mountains.

      • Che Banana@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        and this is how it’s “recycled”

        “Just think of all the job opportunities we are giving to underdeveloped nations and their youth!”

        -Nestlé CEO probably

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      When I was a kid, it was “Reduce, Re-use, Recycle”. The order was quite intentional.

      Nobody ever talks about the first two anymore. Probably because they are wildly anti-consumption and thus bad for business.

      I went on vacation recently. Visited Houston, Austin, and Dallas by EV. I was, and still am, amazed that the giant gas stations along the highway (Buc-ees, Road Ranger) are still using Styrofoam cups at the soda fountain. I can’t believe those are even still being made.