A White mother who said she was questioned about human trafficking while traveling with her biracial daughter has filed a lawsuit against Southwest Airlines, accusing the company of “blatant racism.”

  • El Barto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    If I’m honest, I’m kinda okay if that happened to me, because if their methods are helping to stop actual human trafficking, then it’s worth it.

    I remember me at the beach with my girlfriend once. She was 22 at the time, but looked younger than that - 16 or 17. I looked like, well, the 23 year old dude I was. She fell at some point and I crouched to assist her. A lifeguard walked up to us and the whole time he was addressing her: “are you okay? do you feel safe?” Etc. My girlfriend answered all his questions and then he went away. He probably thought I was some pervert trying to take advantage of the situation. And I was like “I get it.” If she was an actual minor and I was some pervert stranger, I’m glad someone was paying attention to the situation.

    • Academician@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      If stopping Arabic-looking people stopped actual terrorist attacks, would it be worth it?

      • MagicShel@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        I gave this question far more thought than it probably deserves and the answer is no.

        The only world in which this is possible is one where you define terrorism by appearance (which already hits pretty damn close to home). So I’d want the same mechanism applied to all people to catch the violent extremists of all appearances.

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Fair point, but that’s a different context, and I agree with you with that sentiment.

        The 9/11 terrorists didn’t even have beards. They tried to blend in as much as possible. So, you’re right. Harassing people with, say, beards and turbans is bullshit.

      • SamboT@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        How often would it stop terrorist attacks for each person stopped? We are talking about saving lives versus saving people from being offended correct?

        • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          You’re talking about formalising the concept of treating an entire demographic of people as 2nd class citizens who experience additional social barriers that others do not have to.

          “I racially profiled every Mohammed in the US and 128,000 improper searches and surveillances down the list I discovered a terrorist. Mission accomplished.”

          • SamboT@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Thank you for providing a ratio. No I would not be okay with that.

            I’m sure I wouldn’t be okay with racially profiling based on the real world numbers either. But I would be okay being questioned because I matched a statistically significant group of people who commit a crime that impacts the safety of others.

            But I think the point is that race and gender are most often not statistically significant identifiers and shouldn’t be used. And if they are indicative, then it better not be used for any of amount of time longer than needed.

            If we had intelligence that suggested we should expect a terrorist attack from a specific country during a specific time period at a specific airport then it might make sense on a temporary basis. I don’t know, I’m not a professional at preventing terrorist attacks.

            If there were rules against race on a more permanent basis because of events in the past or something then that would be stupid, ineffective, and would needlessly offend people.

            My only real issue with threads like these is the over generalization and trying to say that something should never happen or always happen. I don’t think life is like that.

        • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          You do not want to cross the bride. Don’t do that. Though, seriously, that’s no good for anyone who it has already gotten very old for and that people are explaining away the feelings of.