• idiomaddict@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Just FYI, before you offer it to your kid, please do significant research. They’re constantly getting better, so by then it may be fine, but non hormonal IUDs have been linked with hella scarring in the past.

    • evranch@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      We did a ton of research when my wife first got one, I studied biochem so figured I could assess the situation fairly well.

      Non-hormonal are awful and I wouldn’t recommend them to anyone. Mirena on the other hand does release hormones, but in small enough quantity that the effects are basically topical - localized to the uterus and serum concentrations are barely affected compared to pills or shots.

      • idiomaddict@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I brain farted and thought mirena was the copper one. Thank god, I thought you were super attached to giving an eleven year old a non hormonal iud. I had a state university clinician tell me that I was a conspiracy theorist for thinking there could be scarring and straight up pressure me to let her insert it, so I assume someone out there is recommending them to people.

        • evranch@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yikes, I can’t imagine who would recommend copper unless someone had a bad reaction to the hormonal type. The mode of action is totally different, with hormonal suppressing the whole cycle and copper being more like a continuous abortion.

          My wife didn’t have a period for years aside from some occasional spotting with Mirena, I figure if we can save my daughter a decade of cramping and bleeding by offering her one young, the birth control is almost a happy side effect.