• A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    AI, unlike a human, cannot create unique works of art. it can old produce an algorithmically-derived malange of its source-data recomposited in novel forms

    Find me a single sentence in that entire article that suggests AI art is composites of source data

    You can’t, because how it actually works is wildly different than how you want to believe it works.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The entire article explains that’s how it works. I’m sorry it’s just over your head.

      • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Mhm, I’m sure that’s why you couldn’t find a single sentence about compositing images

        DALL·E 2 uses a diffusion model conditioned on CLIP image embeddings, which, during inference, are generated from CLIP text embeddings by a prior model.

        You’re either projecting or being dishonest

        • gregorum@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Correction: you do not comprehend what you are cherry-picking. Your ignorance and failure to understand to not make you right.

          • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            If it’s cherry-picked it should be easy to give me a single sentence, but apparently you can’t lol

            • gregorum@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I already gave it to you in a single sentence:

              “You have no idea what you’re talking about.”

              Even that was too difficult for you to understand.

              • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                “your evidence is cherry-picked but I refuse to provide any of my own, why aren’t you just trusting me??” very convincing

                • gregorum@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  You already provided the evidence in your link. It’s not my fault you don’t understand. Also, it’s not my job to educate you, nor to soothe your bruised ego.

                  I recommend some ice cream. Perhaps that will make you feel better.

                  • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    And I provided evidence the article says something wildly different than what you want it to say, and all you have is “read it again until it says something else” lol

                    Also voting with two accounts is pathetic