ryujin470@fedia.io to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 4 months agoIf copyright on a work expired immediately after death, would be that a bad or good idea?message-squaremessage-square91linkfedilinkarrow-up186arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up180arrow-down1message-squareIf copyright on a work expired immediately after death, would be that a bad or good idea?ryujin470@fedia.io to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 4 months agomessage-square91linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareparaphrand@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoI do think they said a publisher was involved. But what about when they are not?
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoIf the duration of copyright is short enough, why reduce it further based on heartbeat?
minus-squareparaphrand@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoHmm, I think there may have been some confusion on my part here. I’m fine with copyright directly serving individual authors and their families. I’m not into how that is expanded and abused by corporations.
I do think they said a publisher was involved.
But what about when they are not?
If the duration of copyright is short enough, why reduce it further based on heartbeat?
Hmm, I think there may have been some confusion on my part here. I’m fine with copyright directly serving individual authors and their families.
I’m not into how that is expanded and abused by corporations.