• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Humans would rapidly organize right back into cities

    The Amish already live in townships. Congregations of humans are generally better for the environment than far-flung rural enclaves with low-efficiency infrastructure.

    People seem to forget how much ecological destruction occurred at or prior to an Amish standard of living. Case in point, the deforestation of Europe

    the bulk of which was completed before the 16th century.

    “Primitive” does not mean “ecologically sustainable”. Quite a bit of our animal husbandry, agricultural, and pre-industrial economic activity were horrifyingly bad. We just weren’t operating at the scale of eight billion humans while we were living like that.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yep. Coal and wood as the main energy sources are absolutely awful. Global warming would be gone because people would be dead from the pollution. There’s a reason that there were tons of maids cleaning old mansions constantly.