• RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Even at over double the other guys estimate on power per area, it isn’t even touching the requirements of major data centres. What it takes to run a normal house is tiny, they likely have servers that individually draw more power than my entire household, and they have hundreds if not thousands of these servers.

    Do it anyway because solar is the closest thing to free power we have, but it isn’t gonna cover the building.

    • PagPag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well of course. Which is why I mentioned it making a significant impact. Full offset wouldn’t be feasible without it being as large of a scope a the data center construction itself; not even considering storage requirements.

      The unfortunate likelihood of projections (currently taking shape) being well understood, and accepted, at the time is extremely high.

      It’s a win-win if you’re the owner of the server farm who had closed door discussions with the power company beforehand. I mean the citizens don’t win, but when has this ever been a concern?

      If it was in their best interests financially, it would be included in the financial model before construction. My guess is that it was more appealing to just cut deals with various players.