Pro@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 4 days agoRustprogramming.devimagemessage-square99fedilinkarrow-up1926arrow-down146
arrow-up1880arrow-down1imageRustprogramming.devPro@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square99fedilink
minus-squareCroquette@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8·4 days agoI interface with low level communication protocols, mostly uart, so it fits my use case. But it is nice to see the hurdles people encounters. It tells a lot about the language.
minus-squarebrucethemoose@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-24 days agoYeah. I wasn’t trying to imply it’s a bad language at all; it just fits certain use cases. They are complex, like people. Still, it seems like it’d be cool for engine work, with C# or maybe a subset of typed Python as a scripting language.
I interface with low level communication protocols, mostly uart, so it fits my use case. But it is nice to see the hurdles people encounters. It tells a lot about the language.
Yeah. I wasn’t trying to imply it’s a bad language at all; it just fits certain use cases. They are complex, like people.
Still, it seems like it’d be cool for engine work, with C# or maybe a subset of typed Python as a scripting language.